While injury mortality and hospitalization rates continue to creep downwards (use the PHAC injury surveillance tool to explore national/provincial rates http://dsol-smed.hc-sc.gc.ca/dsol-smed/is-sb/c_time-eng.php ), progress in preventing injury has not happened with the same rapidity as it has for other illnesses. Motor vehicle crash mortality rates have decreased over 50%, other causes of unintended injury have not been so dramatically reduced. In the embedded graphic, the green line represents Motor vehicle crashes which have decreased by almost 2/3rds. All other unintentional injuries have only reduced by about ¼. The red line represents all unintentional injuries including motor vehicle crashes.
There are newer ways of protection from injury that have
been and are being implemented. Health
Evidence has recently posted several and primary sources are included in this
field that needs to be further padded.
Graduated licensing
reduces crashes by 15.5 – 22% Graduating licensing
. The effect seems to be sustained beyond just the first year of driving as
well. The effect is similar for fatal, injury and non-injury type of crashes. There is a higher impact on night time and
alcohol associated crashes, with benefits of 20-40%. Implemented in all
provinces now (Nunavut has yet to take the plunge), it takes drivers through
three phases of preparedness starting with accompanied driving; then limited
numbers of passengers, no night time driving, no alcohol; before receiving full
licensure. The Cochrane review is well
worth reading for the rigour and style if you have access Cochrane
review - link may not work from some work sites and outside of Canada .
Speed cameras are
not implemented in all provinces, having been subjected to political
interference in an injury protection endeavour. Resistance was based on the perception that
speed cameras were merely an easy way of generating fine based income. This review should provide further evidence
for those jurisdictions that need proof that speed cameras save lives as they
are associated with a 8-50% reduction in collisions, 11-44% reduction in fatal
and serious collisions, and overall reductions in road speeds and proportion of
speeders. Speed cameras . The full review is also in the Cochrane
database.
Bicycle helmet
legislation increases usage, but impact on actual outcomes hard to measure thought suggestive of benefit. Bicycle helmet
legislation Not surprising given
the relative infrequency of serious events and the methodological challenges in
doing comparative studies.
Speaking of safety
helmets, helmet
use in skiing and snowboarding showing a 35%-40% reduction in head
injuries amongst helmet users (full
reference for those with library access CMAJ
2010, 182(4) pp 333-340) . This increased to up to 60% for studies
looking specifically at children. The
effect is greatest for beginners and males, lacking significance with expert
skiers and females.
Protect yourself - buckle up and wear the gear....
No comments:
Post a Comment