What could be nicer, a single family home in a rural area on
an acre lot. Sounds idyllic for many and
might contribute to peace of mind, but what does it do to your health? Yes, at the end of the day you can have a
nice walk in a rural like setting. You
may get some activity associated with maintaining the property. But, you will need to travel to get food, go to
work or school, get any of a range of services and your activity levels actually decrease. On the other hand, people in New York are now getting fitter
whilst living in dense urban settings.
Is it an inconsistency? not really. Our love affair with the car has contributed
to the expansion of the waist. Not the
only factor, but one that has been reversed through forward thinking urban
planning. Walkable communities, not just
communities with walking paths, but where groceries and service areas are
readily accessible and the use of single passenger vehicles has multiple barriers. Public transportation brings people close to
services, there is still a need to walk the final steps in either end of the
trip. It beats the walk from the front
door to the car, and the parking garage to the elevator.
Bicycle friendly communities with dedicated lanes, pools of
bikes available for core urban use, and just the safety in numbers have added
to the repopularization of the bike.
Urban planning that builds in walking friendly settings can
make a huge difference to community wellbeing.
Barriers to vehicles such as London’s tolls for downtown
traffic, traffic calming structures, and readily accessible public transport can
reduce the single vehicle dependence. Market
pricing of gasoline has done wonders for encouraging behaviour change more than
any planning policy.
Is it sufficient to overcome our bulging waistlines, time
will tell – but there are encouraging signs.
What is needed is to ensure that urban planning thinks about health, not
just sustainable economic growth
Read more on the state of science on linking the built environment to health at Ontario coaltion on HBE , the majority of well documented and a few intervention studies relate to walkability and air pollution – however limiting the discussion of healthy built environment to only proven issues, has the potential to preclude many aspects of how the environment affects other aspects of our wellbeing. Simcoe Muskoka literature review; APHEO literature review on linking with chronic diseases; BC HBE indicators; .
Read more on the state of science on linking the built environment to health at Ontario coaltion on HBE , the majority of well documented and a few intervention studies relate to walkability and air pollution – however limiting the discussion of healthy built environment to only proven issues, has the potential to preclude many aspects of how the environment affects other aspects of our wellbeing. Simcoe Muskoka literature review; APHEO literature review on linking with chronic diseases; BC HBE indicators; .
No comments:
Post a Comment