The CIHI report https://secure.cihi.ca/free_products/health_indicators_2012_en.pdf introduced in the previous blog provides the
richness of information that can be a guidance for health improvement. Of course, improvement to what is a good
question since currently immortality is a fantasy. So here are the best of the health regions,
best province and how much better could the worst of the provinces and regions
do if they were to get to the best practices in Canada. Except for the one rate to celebrate, the
territories were omitted from the analysis and oftentimes have poorer health
indicators than the worst health region.
PEI is treated as a single health region as well as a province.
Indicator
|
Best region and rate
|
Best province and rate
|
Improvement if worst province could align with the best
|
Improvement if the worst region could align with the best
|
Age standardized mortality (per 100,000 population)
|
Richmond BC (155)
|
BC (244)
|
a reduction of 66 or 21% of the current rate)
|
a reduction of 211 or 58% of the current rate
|
Potential years of life lost
|
Richmond BC 2707
|
Ontario 4182
|
A reduction of 1849 or of 31%
|
A reduction of 5017 or of 65% of the current rate
|
Cancer incidence
|
|
Alberta 399.8
|
186.6 or 32%
|
|
Youth body mass index (25 or greater)
|
|
BC 16.4
|
Reduction of 15.8 or 52% of the current level
|
|
High blood pressure
|
|
Yukon, NWT and Nunavut with ranges of 9-11.6
|
Current highest level is 24.6% of population
|
|
Injury hospitalization per 100,000 population
|
Central ON 306
|
Ontario 407
|
302 or 48% reduction to be achieved
|
A reduction of 790 or 71% of the current rate
|
Acute myocardial infarction hospitalization
|
South Vancouver Island BC 118
|
BC 163
|
157 or a 48% reduction
|
260 or a reduction of 69%
|
Smoking
|
|
BC 17.4
|
5.8 or a 25% reduction
|
|
5+ fruits or vegetables per day
|
|
Quebec 50.4%
|
21.8% or a 76% increase required
|
|
Potentially avoidable mortality
|
Richmond BC 113
|
BC 172
|
46 or a 20% reduction
|
159 or a 58% reduction
|
Avoidable mortality from preventative causes
|
Richmond BC 70
|
Ontario 110
|
33 or a 23% reduction
|
114 or a 61% reduction
|
The point here is consistently the better to do provinces
are 25% better than those that are not so well off, and the better health
region are a whopping 3 times worse off than those that are well off. To which the reminder must be issued that the rates
for the territories are often worse that the poorest of the health regions on
many indicators.
In Canada, inequity is alive. The CIHI report begins to at least unmask
some of the disparities that are in place at home.
No comments:
Post a Comment