The Ontario Common Front, a collaboration
of social action groups released a provincial assessment with the claim that
Ontario is falling behind other provinces in their social programming. It is a good read, and filled with wonderful
tidbits of information. Falling
Behind. Of particular interest are
the analyses of the impact of the 1990’s “tax cut competition” that has greatly
impacted provincial government revenues, contributing to the compromised
ability to mitigate the recessive economic period that we continue to struggle
to climb out of.
Just to remain equitable and not covet
Ontario’s claim to fame on the worst record on social programming. Here are a few other claims about being at
the bottom of the stack for the provinces only (ie not including the territories)
BC:
child poverty after taxes, drivers, minimum wage and a list at BC -
The worst record in Canada
Alberta : worst and rudest drivers
Saskatchewan – both worst roads and worst
impaired drivers may contribute to the documented worst injury rates, scenery
(yup – somebody actually polled on it), family violence
Manitoba – hip replacement waiting time,
child poverty before taxes.
Quebec – worst managed province, least friendly
New Brunswick – fiscal management
PEI – minimum wage, quality of life, mental
illnesses
Nova Scotia – performing economy
Newfoundland and Labrador – perhaps perfect
in almost every way. Still - worst on
myocardial infarction events, stroke events, C-section rates
There are multiple efforts that attempt to
measure the best locations, most liveable cities, most equitable societies,
most caring communities. When playing
with statistics and numbers, there will be a top and a bottom impacted by
individual or organizational biases that selectively present data to support
their position. Whether looking at the
Fraser Institute or various poverty coalitions – data presentation becomes
skewed .
Even our esteemed Statistics Canada is
subject to subjective filtering. For a
discussion on how poverty and income are measured and interpreted, two
contrasting opinions written a decade apart by senior Statistics Canada staff Zhang 2010
Fellegi 1997
which contain similar concepts but reflect changing perceptions.
Who really wants to be worst? Change is stimulated by success and positive
reinforcement – not focusing on the negative. Shaming political leaders does invoke a stimulus that may lead to short term change, but rarely long term sustained improvement
No comments:
Post a Comment