If you are not impressed with President Obama’s proposals on
controlling gun violence, you should be, some will call it very bold. It is at least politically astute. In the two party political system of the US,
it takes an issue with clear political lines, and has carved a ditch in the
sand.
This site has discussed gun control on several occasions for
its public health benefit, most recently in Another
shot at peace . There is no need to further
discuss the public health merits of gun control, that has never been the issue.
Gun control is one potential
intervention to address the excessive number of firearms related deaths in the
US and choosing between equivalent options is as much a political choice as based
in solid evidence.
Look however at the process and the proposal as a solid
example of policy development. In the
weeks leading up to the proposal, there were innumerable public polls
demonstrating support for increased controls on guns. The topic received a disproportionate amount
of air time on the news media, even if CNN clearly was unbalanced in presenting
a predominately pro-gun position.
Ultimately, there were hearings and solid submissions from
health organizations on the detriment of firearms and the health benefits that
can be accrued through specific policy directions. Many of these were directly included in the
Obama proposals.
Of course, when a
substantive majority of Americans are asking for tighter controls because of the
school shooting tragedy, making a proposal for substantive leap in control
becomes easier, and the President did not disappoint.
All that rests in the way of change is a tenuous Republican
party that stands to lose considerable political credibility no matter what it
does, and hence the brilliance of the policy proposal. To not support the proposal would fly in the
face of what is a clear majority. To
not object will alienate the far right of the party, who garnish an incredible
level of power and money. It will take a
masterful policy strategist to steer any concerted opposition that holds the
Republicans as a cohesive group.
Tea parties may soon be replaced by Hunting parties.
Check out an excellent synthesis of the proposals, direct
issues, and actions through the APHA who have been instrumental in contributing
to the reform proposals Public
Health newswire Jan 17th.
What a few months ago would have been a shot in the dark,
has become a masterfully crafted missile that is right on target.
Unfortunately progress comes on the graves of the twenty-six
innocent victims at Sandy Hook Elementary in Newtown.
No comments:
Post a Comment