DrPHealth welcomes guest items such as the following. Drphealth@gmail.com
When it comes to health care
spending, more money doesn’t equal better outcomes.
Bloomberg recently compiled
a ranking comparing health care economics and life expectancy. Of the
parameters, the strongest correlation is found between health care cost per
capita and life expectancy. However, the association is far from linear.
Up until ~$3000, there is a
logarithmic rise in life expectancy as the dollars spent increase. Then, a
plateau. Canadians, which have life expectancies similar to the Greek and Portuguese,
spend twice as much (or, get half the bang for their buck).
This plateau is even more
pronounced when increasing the countries analyzed. Gapminder , an interactive indicator
goldmine headed by statistical genius Hans Rosling, even provides a time-based
visualization. In the last 15 years, small investments in developing nations
have had large effects on outcomes (the logarithmic part of the curve). All the while, Canada’s 280% increase in
spending resulted in marginal health
benefit improvement.
When comparing health care costs
as a percentage of GDP the correlation is weaker though affirming that economic
vitality tends to be predictive of better health. .
From a global perspective, much
could be done to decrease inequities and improve lives by investing little.
At home, we seem stuck on the
notion that more money will solve our woes. Provincial budgets are closing in
on 50% devoted to health care, and continue to grow above inflation. These
funds are all too often it’s siphoned from other provincial departmental pots
such as environment, housing, social development, public safety, child &
family development, agriculture, and advanced education. Those departments with
the greatest influence on the determinants of health are losing out to direct health care expenditures.
A different approach to spending
is essential, and a gradual paradigm shift is in progress. Take the CMA’s recent summary of
cross-country town halls addressing precisely this issue: “to improve health,
tackle poverty.” While the CMA proudly pronounce that doctors have been sending
this message for the last seven years, many public health doctors and other
professionals have been strong advocates for the same message for decades.
No comments:
Post a Comment