Quietly Statistics Canada has delivered on their promised
release of the third component of the National Household Survey, previously
known as the census. The last of the
releases supposedly delayed by analytic errors
DrPHeallth
August 2013 .
The highlights and high level detail are accessible at NHS
third data release . The local
details can be accessed through the Stats Can portal at
Some observations, and
readers are encouraged to form their own opinions.
An excessive emphasis is placed on
the valuation and attention to government sources of income such as old age
security and employment assistance.
A clear emphasis that financial
independence was more associated with self-employed income.
Avoidance of discussion of the maldistribution
of income.
An emphasis on how those in the
lowest deciles of income receive their income and how those in the highest
deciles carry a disproportionate share of income tax.
Minimal analysis of the very high
income earners who have been the target of poverty advocates - data are presented by deciles only.
Who said that data is objective? Most statisticians will tell you that data
can be manipulated and presented in a fashion to convey specific messages. Clearly Statistics Canada has presented a
very biased selection of data and hidden information which those advocating for
healthier distribution of resources would have found beneficial in supporting
their arguments. Even the detailed
tabulations hide what is a mounting concern, the rich are getting richer and
the poor are getting poorer Statistics
Canada data tables A small section on
high income earners is buried in the national geographic data release buried below
the provincial listing that reemphasizes the value placed on non government
transfer income Stats
Can national geographic data.
That the data were delayed by an analytic glitch may remain
the party line. More likely the data
were withheld so that the presentation format aligned with specific political
agendas. A further embarrassment on
Statistics Canada, once revered for its independence, now a tool to support
political agendas.
Readers are encouraged to mine the income data and please
comment on their interpretation of the findings. For those daunted by trying to navigate the
Statistics Canada website, access to various geographic aggregations of the
data can be found at Focus on
Geographic Series
September 13 - catch the Globe and Mail analysis on how the National Household survey information on poverty is acknowledged as unreliable. More evidence the government decision to eliminate the long form census was not based on protection of privacy, but a systematic elimination of social issues that federally can be ignored.
September 13 - catch the Globe and Mail analysis on how the National Household survey information on poverty is acknowledged as unreliable. More evidence the government decision to eliminate the long form census was not based on protection of privacy, but a systematic elimination of social issues that federally can be ignored.
I guess an "analytic glitch" could be an accurate description of a "glitchy analyst". Depending on who is defining 'glitchy'.
ReplyDelete