It is
somewhat of a distorted honour to be allowed to write one’s one obituary, but
the Health Council of Canada has done just that in its final report before funding
is eliminated on March 31. In the 2003
pan-Canadian health accord which is also set to expire, the council was
formed. Those accords have perhaps begun
to turn the direction of the health care system with a re-emphasis on primary
health care and the Health Council of Canada was charged with monitoring that
progress.
In its
final report to Canadians, it outlines what it sees as accomplishments in its
short life. Perhaps it might be better viewed as a short history of Canadian
Health Care for the past decade as it richly touches on the pressing issues of
electronic health records, pharmaceuticals, primary health care, home and
community care, telehealth, wait times and access, aboriginal health and patient care and safety among
others. Read the report at Highlights
of health care reform
Two areas
it perhaps failed in were in the mental health and addictions (perhaps because
of the Mental Health Commission of Canada having taken a lead) and Public Health.
The passing
of the council is perhaps the most tangible and obvious change associated with
a more disconcerting situation. It marks
the extraction of the federal government from any formal involvement in health
with some minor exceptions. International
issues, quarantine at the borders, federal public services and federal lands,
and First Nations under treaty. Noting
that even for First Nations the federal government is slowly divesting itself
of long term responsibility through redefined relationships with the First
nations and provinces in what may be a constructive change.
To those
who served on the Health Council of Canada, our heartfelt thanks. Given the lack of attention, the relative
dismissal of its work, and the strained relationship with the federal
government, it persevered and leaves a legacy that others will have to live up
to.
Most
importantly though, it was the only body in place that attempted to hold the
system accountable through cross jurisdictions comparisons. That function falls to the wayside and the
system once again becomes accountable only to itself.
No comments:
Post a Comment