The era of the
Megaregions and ‘Big Health’ has arrived.
The first
health regions in Saskatchewan had as few as a few thousand people and clearly
were not viable. Over time the number of
regions has gradually diminished as the balance between geography and trying to
reflect community needs has been juggled by a handful of individuals sitting in
provincial capitals.
This week Nova
Scotia announced the dismantling of the district health boards through an
eloquent legal slight of hand. While effectively
maintaining the districts, their boards were all dismissed and replaced a
single administrator responsible for all health districts. Nova Scotia health
boards dismissed.
Alberta
dissolved health regions into a single megaregion and have yet to recover or
develop an effective operating modality. With BC now at five regional authorities,
Saskatchewan at 12, Manitoba 5 (reduced from 11 late last year), Ontario with
14 LHINs, Quebec at 18, New Brunswick 2, Newfoundland at 4, (PEI, Yukon, Nunavut also
have single boards, NWT has 8) the number of 67 has gradually diminished over the last
decade with a starting position in the hundreds nationally.
While some provinces also have tertiary level services combined into a provincial health authority or equivalent, even these are getting rolled into the megaregions as politicians recognize the high costs of tertiary services can be mitigated by better primary and secondary services.
Somewhere
someone should be asking two questions
1. What is the ideal set of size
parameters for a health region?
2. Who is making these decisions on
amalgamation and why?
On the
first question, New Zealand argued in the 90’s that the ideal population was in
the one million mark, and based on performance of many health boards they may
have been close in their number. Given
Nova Scotia is just shy of the 1 Million mark perhaps the recent decision makes
sense.
The bigger
questions is why? Yes there is a small
amount of money to be gleamed by reducing boards and by marginally reducing
administrations (although this is questionable). The developing question is how the health
regions now interact with the Ministries of Health. Or, what exactly are the Ministries of Health
now doing?
As the
trend continues we can expect Health regions is be limited to implementation
and delivery of services and the buffer between the consumer and the politician,
Ministries of Health will not just monitor quality but also increasingly be
responsible for program development. By controlling the size and function of
the Health regions, Ministers of Health effectively are distanced from the
problems at the patient bed or clinic room, but fully in control of what is
happening. It is all about limiting the political
liability of health as there is limited political currency to be gained in
health.
Communities
are merely been given lip service, non-government organizations are used to
fill in on the fringe activities that are politically unpalatable, and the family
is being left behind in standardized protocols.
Big “H” health has arrived, driven by the triple bottom lines that
include finances, quality and effectiveness of care, and supposed concern about
employees.
Through
this the need to modernize public health remains. Vested in tradition and seeking long term
benefits the current public health models lack comparability against waiting
times, complication rates, and payback value of less than four years.
The elephant in all this is the future of primary health care and delivery of physician services. One can expect these to begin to be rolled into the Megaregions in order to have an even better grasp on the continuum of health services. This despite the active resistance to such change by the medical community.
Fasten your
seatbelts, the rapidity of change will be increasing, with those not strapped
in will be left standing in the sidelines and left behind and unable to
influence the direction of the future health system.
A valuable Twitter conversation
ReplyDelete@Danu1Donahue: From this my comment is, to whom do we serve? People or politicians.;) I went into healthcare to serve the former.
DrPHealth Reply
Funny, the politicians say the same thing about who and why they serve. Why the schism? More important how to close the gap?
@Danu1Donahue Reply
@drphealth I think it is really a basic which many tend to forget to care about with power. Trust, honest communication, relationships. and once political power backers such as huge corporate backers get in there, politicians forget.
and this is old news, right? Build from the ground up with community engagement/development.