Plenty of news on HIV these days. That World AIDS day is December 1st
might be just coincidental.
Leading the headlines is the report out of BC on the success
of HAART in reducing population transmission Picard
story on HIV fight. This is great news. Perhaps a bit self-serving for the 'treatment
as prevention' folks that are taking credit for the reduction. The STOP HIV program, which inherently makes
a lot of sense, was only implemented in 2008 and the data on which the research
they are claiming success reflects the time period of 1995-2008 (up to start of
STOP HIV). The BC reduction in incidence
began in about 2003 and has been consistent over most of the last 9 years.
They also fail to acknowledge that Canada has started
trending downwards since 2008.
Read the full article at PLOS
One Burden of HIV in Canada. The
conclusion is based on data from only three provinces who had innumerable other
differences in their approach to addressing HIV and not just in access to
HAART. There are other correlations that
might also explain the differences noted, including political stripes of the
leadership. So while non-treatment public
health efforts across the country have likely been the major initiators of the
downward trend, the use of treatment will be advantageous to sustaining the
decrease. One can see a very similar
trend with tuberculosis rates prior to and following the discovery off streptomycin
as one of the first effective anti-TB drugs.
A more balanced discussion of the Stop HIV approach can be
found in a CMAJ editorial at CMAJ on
HIV seek and treat
In honour of World AIDS day, Health Evidence has produced a
list of high quality evidence reviews of practices associated with control of
HIV http://health-evidence.ca/saved_searches/run_search/1134 although some are very dated.
Also in recognition of World AIDS day is the release of an
international report The
beginning of the end. Notable as
well on page 11 is the incidence of HIV globally has been decreasing since 2003
– the reasons internationally are different from the Canadian experience.
US rates are more difficult to obtain, and perhaps
reflective of less positive news as well.
A detailed analysis was published at US
HIV statistics 2008-2011. A real positive is the addition to the USPTF of universal screening for HIV USTPF draft
HIV screening recommendation as a Grade A recommendation.
No comments:
Post a Comment