Healthevidence.ca, recently underway a revision and change
of location to www.healthevidence.org,
be sure to update your favourites. Monthly, a communication highlights the best
of the synthesis reviews that have been added to their collection. For those
not on the list, a smattering of the strong reviews for June are listed below
with links that should work. The
downside of some of this, is that Health Evidence is going the way of Cochrane
and publishing many reviews that disregard the value of the range of
epidemiological studies.
The highlight of particular interest is on the effectiveness
of programs to prevent juvenile delinquency, often through visits to local
establishments of incarceration. The
main conclusion was that these programs were more harmful than helpful. The studies however were all undertaken
between 1967 and 1992 – begging the question why would such programs exist
currently at all? Is this just a way of making the privileged classes feel good that they are doing something? It is a clear example of where programming based on fear, and programming entrenched in middle class beliefs and not program recipients views - are unlikely to work and can be harmful. Juvenile
delinquency prevention
Noting also that there is a reasonably good review as well on
regulation change as an intervention to prevent aggression and injury in
hockey.
Review-level evidence on the effectiveness
of public health and health promotion interventions:
|
Review Quality
Rating
|
Strong
|
|
Strong
|
|
Strong
|
|
Strong
|
|
Strong
|
|
Strong
|
|
Strong
|
|
Strong
|
|
Strong
|
|
Strong
|
|
Strong
|
|
Strong
|
|
Strong
|
|
Strong
|
|
Strong
|
|
No comments:
Post a Comment