Climate
change and public health are integrally related, and while some folks have been
trying very hard to push public health front line staff to take more aggressive
stances on climate change policies, without warm embracement. Embracing environmental health issues that
have outcomes measurable over decades is challenging without current political
time frames. Incorporating specific targets on issues like greenhouse gases is
more tangible and concrete, hence have been more readily accepted without
question of the rationale or purpose in achieving such guidelines.
The more
global issues of climate change are worth a discussion. Today’s trigger came as a retweet originated from
Dónall Geoghegan @DonallGeoghegan as a photo of the proportional allocation of
greenhouse gases by country. The
innovative design was worth replicating, and the origins other than the Tweet
are not ascribed.
While the
graphic looks at arbitrary political boundaries that we are familiar with,
adjusted by population the list of top producers changes per
capita emissions by country and is dominated by oil and gas producing
countries, with Canada sliding into 12 place, two spots ahead of the US. China
ranks 121st, India at 162nd both of whom appear
implicated by the absolute volume production.
Diving
deeper Canadian greenhouse gas (GHG) production is documented at National
greenhouse gas inventory An
amazingly succinct and clear document to read and follow. Whether filtered by political manipulation,
the purpose of the document is for reporting to the international convention
and seems to address current needs in a moderately objective manner.
Of note,
that Canada’s major GHG production is broken out in the graphs on both pages 4
and 5. Energy and transportation
dominate the sources. Alberta producing just
over 35% of the GHG. On a per capita
basis, the Maritime provinces, Quebec and
Manitoba are the lowest consumers. Again, the simple adage of oil and gas
producing provinces having the highest per capita production of GHGs.
Oil sands
production contributes to about 8% of Canadian GH emissions. While recognizing the source, it is often
useful to review industry developed interpretations and this can be found at Oil
sands today GHG and Canadian
Association of Petroleum Producers, both of whom emphasize the relative
contribution to coal production and the proportionate contribution by the
consumer compared with their role in production. Fair points to consider.
The good
news is found in the national inventory document. Irrespective of the measure, Canadian GHG have leveled off and are slightly
declining. Will it be sufficient to meet
the 2020 Copenhagen Convention target of a 17% reduction? It wasn’t sufficient to meet the Kyoto
targets that Canada quietly abandoned.
The graphic comes from here
ReplyDeletehttp://resources.news.com.au/files/2011/06/14/1226075/137644-hs-file-australia-part-of-the-climate-problem.pdf
created by Kirsten Duncan for the then Australian Government Department of Climate Change and Energy Efficiency.