Breastfeeding
was celebrated this past weekend with a mass latch on across the country, and
in some cities, flash mob breastfeeding events were being held. A great expression of one of Canada's public health successes
Breastfeeding
rates have neared 90% after dropping two generations ago to less than
one-third. An amazing celebration of
both public health and feminism in reclaiming what is by far the best option
for most babies.
Like many
things in medicine and health care, the marginal value becomes questionable of moving
through various levels of breastfeeding from supplementing with other formula (or
for older infants solids), through occasional juices and water to never using
anything but the real McCoy. Not to
suggest that there is no value, only to emphasize that there is greater importance in supporting parents in
any breastfeeding than to leave individuals feeling guilt over their choices.
Breastfeeding
is now adopted most by older mothers, the most educated and the most
economically endowed. It has almost
become a sign of social status. Granted
rates remain lower as one travels east across Canada, Aboriginal women are less
likely to breast feed, as are those in non-marital relationships.
Current
national guidelines stress exclusive breastfeeding for the first six months of
life. Our data is less clear than breastfeeding initiation, but few
jursidictions will boast achieving even 50% breastfeeding rates at 6 months,
let alone at 4 months.
Hence the question
needs to be reiterated, why and how do we support families in sustaining breastfeeding? Moreover, given that so many women choose to
not maintain exclusive breastfeeding through the first half year of life, let
alone continue latching up to one or two years of age – why do our public
health programs remain focused on just initiation? Or moreover focus on those
who seek support because of what pathologizes anomalies of breastfeeding?
The highest
risk for weaning early is among those that would benefit most through
socioeconomic challenges, through social conditions or just through lack of
education. Too often the professional
women, highly motivated and for whom the marginal benefits of sustained breastfeeding
become the target of misdirected comments and efforts – as they seek public
health support in other aspects of their parenting role.
Breast is
best, and better when sustained. But at least let us be focused in what value we
are achieving in our comments and efforts.
Thought provoking as always. Your post led to a conversation with a colleague about whether we are too focused on exclusive breastfeeding, and contributing to feelings of inadequacy in women who can't achieve breastfeeding superstardom. Some new research is daring to explore whether controlled and minimal supplementation may improve breastfeeding duration rates. All "Baby Friendly" proponents need to remember that the reason we promote breastfeeding is not because we want breastfeeding to succeed, but because we want mothers and babies and families to succeed. It is, after, BABY friendly, not breastfeeding friendly. Help moms and families feel confident that they are feeding their baby in the best way according to their situation and priorities.
ReplyDelete