Recent events have clearly demonstrated the willinginess of
governments to intervene during a recession.
An activity which predominately supported corporations and those with
the largest investment portfolios and incomes.
What if we were faced with an intellectual recession. How would governments react?
To begin the discourse, what would one expect in an intellectual
recession?
·
reduced enrolment rates in fulltime undergraduate
programming. While it appears there are
some 817820 enrollees in 2012 (AUCC
enrollment data 2012), the last Statistics Canada data predates the
economic recession and are not comparable Stats
Can enrollment to 2008 (why would this data not be readily available?)
·
higher youth without jobs – while statistics are
not good, rates hovering in the mid-teens to 20 % are reported in some areas
which rival depressed areas of US and Eurozone and are well reported in Huff Post . In a weird quirk of EI statistics, in order
to be “unemployed” you have to have first been employed, so the number of
unemployed youth may be a significant underestimate for new graduates that have
never obtained adequate employment.
·
Numbers of Canadians taking temporary or long
term employment outside the country.
For which no source of information could be found on data more recent
than 2008 More
data from Stats Can which is untimely and pre-recession. This used to be referred to as brain drain for
the most elite of researchers, but now includes those taking jobs in US and
Asia.
Help contribute to the discussion by proposing possible indicators in
comments or at drphealth@gmail.com
That none of the indicators are timely, up-to-date or
monitored should raise questions of itself about the openness of government to “bad
news”.
If one were to analyze who benefits from an intellectual
recession, it is those that likely can benefit from lower wages, less skilled
workforce, more focus on labour based employment – basically corporate Canada.
The ultimate question on an intellectual recession is how
would one address such a recession? The
economic recession was addressed through government subsidization, capital project
spending, bolstering corporations teetering on financial collapse. In parallel, an intellectual recession might
be addressed through expanding government and private research, subsidization
of education costs, bolstering post-secondary institutions in openness, and a
very forward thinking fashion in investing in early childhood development.
Would evidence of an intellectual recession generate the
same urgent government response that the economic recession would? Does the lack of indicators that would even
unmask such an event a sign that we are avoiding an inconvenient truth?
No comments:
Post a Comment