Oil and
vinegar when mixed together make for a lovely combination of flavours that can
enhance salads, vegetables or as a dip.
But no matter how hard you try, shaking, stirring, blending or other
form of agitation, the two substances will separate out into their separate layers.
Thus it is
with public health and primary health care.
Sir Michael Marmot who continues to be a major influencer of social and
health policy on both sides of the Atlantic touches on the issue in an
editorial in the Lancet
October 12 2013. He even tries to
find ways to blend the great works in the fields of population heath and
primary health care, and concludes that even with the best efforts, there are
still areas like the social determinants of health that become excluded from
the primary health care agenda.
Certainly there is a need
to support primary health care workers in embracing a population health
mentality, and a need to acknowledge that the shift of public health workers to
predominately individual/family services is a migration into primary care
provision.
The astute reader will note the subtle variances in use of
primary health care and primary care, and between public health and population
health. Building on something that has
been attributed to past CPHA president and University of Waterloo MPH program
director Christina Mills “ population health is the way we think, public health
is what we do”. Likewise “primary health
care is a way of thinking, primary care is the delivery of the service”.
The tension faced by public health practitioners is twofold,
first that because much of public health workers now do is primary care, in the
regional authority megaliths they are being forced into marriage with primary
health care entities. Secondly, since there remains a poor understanding of population
health by administrators of these bastions of service delivery, there is a
belief that the primary care provided by public health professionals is the de
facto mysterious population health, and as such a natural union should be
encouraged.
When resources
are tight, and they are tight across the country, trying to kill two birds with
a single dollar is natural, but highly myoptic. While the primary health care
community covets the public health resources, less commonly are population health
folks moving to maximize the opportunities provided by primary health care practitioners.
So who is
the oil and who is the vinegar? It
probably doesn’t matter, neither is very good by themself – both will benefit
from being mixed together, and nature will still dictate that they will be separate solutions.
No comments:
Post a Comment